REM adopts blind peer review. Although authors are allowed to suggest possible reviewers for their article, certain measures have been taken to ensure the integrity of blind peer review (see instructions below: Mandatory Reviewer Suggestions). To complete the precautions, it is prohibited for the Associate Editor and author to have the same origin.
In line with Open Science, SciELO considers three options for advancing the openness of peer review. REM offers authors/reviewers, by mutual agreement and at the discretion of the Associate Editor, to accept the following peer review options:
The standard form of review adopted by the journal is double-blind. However, in cases of preprints, it is not possible to guarantee the anonymity of authors, and therefore the review may be single-blind or open.
To complete the precautions, it is prohibited for the Associate Editor and author to have the same origin. In line with Open Science, SciELO considers three options for advancing the openness of peer review. REM offers authors/reviewers, by mutual agreement and at their discretion, the option of
REM has gradually been aligning itself with the practice of accepting manuscripts previously deposited in preprint repositories. A preprint is defined as a manuscript ready for submission to a journal that is deposited on reliable preprint servers before or in parallel with submission to a journal.
This practice joins continuous publication as a mechanism to accelerate research communication. Preprints share with journals the novelty of article publication and inhibit the use of double-blind procedures in manuscript evaluation. The use of preprints is an option and choice of the authors, and it is up to the journals to adapt their policies to accept the submission of manuscripts previously deposited on a preprint server recognized by the journal. Given the need for a transparent communication process between authors and readers, REM - International Engineering Journal specifies its prior publication policy:
REM recommends that all research data be made public in repositories at the time of submission or that it be made public upon publication of the article. If authors choose to keep research data closed, they must provide justification at the time of manuscript submission, which will be reviewed by the Editor-in-Chief. História da Historiografia recommends that data repositories from institutions with which one of the authors is affiliated or other reliable data repositories be used.
Note: REM will keep the dollar/Real conversion rate unchanged for three months.
The ScholarOne/SciELO system checks for similarity (Duplicate Submission Check), and it is up to the Associate Editor, after analyzing the facts, to accept or reject the percentage shown by the software.
REM also adopts Plagiarism Check, which is reviewed by the Editor-in-Chief and the Associate Editor.
The REM editorial team, as well as authors who publish in the journal, should always observe the guidelines on Sex and Gender Equity in Research (Sex and Gender Equity in Research – SAGER a>). The SAGER guidelines comprise a set of guidelines that guide the reporting of information on sex and gender in study design, data analysis, and the results and interpretation of findings. In addition, REM observes the gender equity policy in the formation of its editorial board.
When applicable in special cases, authors must attach a statement of approval from the ethics committee of the institution responsible for approving the research.
Authors retain the copyright to their work. They grant REM the right of first publication.
Authors of articles published by REM retain the copyright to their work, licensing it under the Creative Commons Attribution license, which allows articles to be reused and distributed without restriction, provided that the original work is correctly cited.
All content in the journal, except where otherwise identified, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.
REM is currently funded by the Gorceix Foundation (https://site.gorceix.org.br/).